How Accurate is Virtual Color Analysis?

With the rise of online consultations, it’s natural to wonder: just how accurate is Virtual Color Analysis?

If you’ve heard that in-person draping is the “gold standard,” you’re not alone—but the truth is more nuanced.

As someone who has performed thousands of color analyses—mostly virtually, but also in person—I care deeply about accuracy, not hype.

I created the ColorBreeze system specifically to address the shortcomings I observed in both traditional and modern approaches to color analysis.

I've written on this topic many times. But I like to remind people occasionally since Color Analysis is so popular now. And many are not cheap (although, honestly, be very wary of those that are cheap! If they were really accurate, they would be charging more for their valuable assessments). 

Why In-Person Draping Isn’t Automatically Better

Many people assume that being physically draped in colored fabric guarantees better results. But here’s the truth: in-person doesn’t always equal accurate.

Over the years, I’ve had many, many clients come to me after being misdiagnosed during expensive in-person sessions, sometimes by multiple analysts.

Why does that happen?

1. The System Itself May Be Limited

Many in-person analysts still rely on the outdated four-season system, which doesn’t account for subtle differences in undertones, chroma, or depth. 

Even the most commonly used system, the 12-season system, is not enough for too many people. That means it is easy to mislabel someone who may have    complex coloring. Too many people fall through the cracks. 

Some seasons are misdiagnosed more than others, particularly the Soft seasons. There are actually quite a few variations among soft seasons with regard to their value and temperature, as well as their level of softness. The 12-season system has only 2 Soft seasons. My ColorBreeze system has a total of 12!

2. Analyst Interpretation Varies

Even if the drapes are well-made and the lighting is ideal, it’s still up to the analyst to interpret what they see. Some may rely on gut feeling rather than identifying true color harmony.

Lack of training and experience is a big factor. I know that when I started analyzing people years ago, I used gut feelings ("oh, that's a pretty color on you").  I didn't really know what I was looking for. 

How Virtual Color Analysis Can Be Just as Accurate

When done thoughtfully, virtual analysis can actually outperform in-person analysis.

In fact, due to my small-town location, I currently conduct almost exclusively virtual analyses. However, if I were to open an in-person studio, I would continue to follow my structured, multi-step process of examining the client's entire color journey, from childhood to their current coloring. 

Here’s how I try to ensure accuracy in my virtual sessions:

✅ Multiple High-Quality Photos

I ask clients to send at least 10–20 photos in different lighting situations (the more the better). This helps me identify consistencies and avoid relying on a single, possibly flawed, image. Here is a page for tips on what types of photos I would like to see. 

✅ Detailed Questionnaire

Color is more than just appearance—it’s also about how your coloring behaves over time. My questionnaire delves into what your childhood coloring was like and how it might have evolved over time, what colors you know are not suitable for you, and other pertinent questions. 

✅ No Rush Judgment

Unlike live sessions, I have the benefit of time. I can study your images carefully, compare, and cross-check against my extensive seasonal system. Seriously, sometimes I have to step away from the photos, get a good night's sleep, and look at things with fresh eyes the next day. 

✅ Thousands of Analyses to Reference

I have worked with over 8,000 clients since I've built my online business, plus more before I launched my website.   So I’ve built a strong mental library of what each season looks like in the real world—not just in theory.

But Doesn’t Photo Quality Affect Results?

Yes—photo quality matters. But that's exactly why I won’t proceed if the images don’t meet certain standards. If lighting, resolution, or makeup interference make it difficult to accurately analyze your coloring, I’ll ask for additional photos. I do it often. 

In fact, I’d rather turn away a sale than give someone the wrong result.

The Problem with “Calibrated Drapes” and Industry Buzzwords

Some companies claim their in-person drapes are “scientifically calibrated” or “proprietary,” implying that the system alone ensures accuracy. But color analysis isn’t a machine-read test. It requires judgment, training, and a solid methodology. Good drapes help, but again, they cannot make up for lack of training or an incomplete color system. 

I’ve seen clients who were analyzed using identical tools by the same brand, and by the same system—yet received very different diagnoses. This is a major problem in the industry. That should tell you something: it’s not the tools alone, but how they’re used. 

When Virtual Color Analysis Isn’t Ideal

To be fair, not everyone is a perfect candidate for virtual analysis. If you can't provide enough good photos for whatever reasons, it can be too hard to get accurate results. 

In these rare cases —which have only happened three times — I’ll always communicate openly and offer options, whether that’s retaking photos or refunding their cost. 

Final Thoughts on Virtual Analysis

So—is virtual color analysis accurate? Yes, it absolutely can be. But accuracy comes from the analyst’s skill, the system they use, and the care put into the process.

I've heard too many stories from clients who've spent an extraordinary amount of money on in-person analysis and were unsatisfied. 

In my work, accuracy always comes first. That’s why I created ColorBreeze—to give people a more reliable way to discover their most flattering colors, whether we meet in person or not.

Return to Home page